Atronomers and astrophysicists determined some years ago – after that strange beastie known as a “black hole” was accepted to probably be a real physical phenomenon, that there are gigantic black holes at the center of galaxies. Moreover, they found they could determine the mass of these galactic black holes via a fairly simple ratio between the mass of the central bulge of stars and the hole they surround (about 1:10,000). It has been presumed that the hole at the galactic center got there by the joining of stellar mass black holes, which then continued to grow by accretion of mass from the stars drawn into the gravity well.

More recently, however, scientists examining galaxies much farther away in space and time found a different pattern. The farther back into the history of the universe they looked, the ratio between galactic black holes and the mass of the stars surrounding them did not follow the 1:10,000 ‘rule’ – the holes account for much more of the mass, meaning they were huge even way back in the early days of the universe.

As quoted in Wired’s article Yo Galaxy’s Mama Is a Black Hole, astronomer Chris Carilli of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory said during a briefing at the American Astronomical Society’s annual meeting that “The simplest conclusion is that the black holes come first and they somehow grow the galaxy around them.”

Supermassive galactic black holes have been noted in galaxies as early as 1.7 billion years after the Big Bang, or 12 billion years ago as seen by us from here on planet earth. These might be survivors of “Primordial Black Holes” theorized to have been created by conditions of the Big Bang, which began to merge after inflation and draw to themselves ever increasing amounts of matter that formed into galaxies. Or some other origin may become apparent with further study, to be greatly enhanced by the Expanded Very Large Array radio telescope system [EVLA] in New Mexico and the Atacama Large Millimeter / submillimeter Array [ALMA] in Chile, which should be completed by 2012.

In other news, the region of our own galaxy’s core has been detailed in high resolution infrared by a composite panorama made up of snapshots by the Hubble and Spitzer space telescopes. “Hi-res” in this instance, covering an area 300 x 115 light years 26,000 light years away from here (and now) means being able to see objects as ’small’ as just 20 times the size of our solar system. Which is quite a feat, and offers an awe-inspiring glimpse of conditions near the core that should make us glad we live way out here in our relatively peaceful long arm of the galaxy instead.

Our home galaxy (the Milky Way) has also grown by 50% recently, though not by accumulating mass or anything. New measurements of how quickly our galaxy is rotating in space led a team of astrophysicists from Harvard to conclude that the mass that makes up our galaxy is 50% larger than previously believed. It may also have four arms instead of two, which would make us look to an observer in Andromeda more like a pinwheel instead of a spiral.

And while the new measurements may serve to inflate our cosmic ego a bit, it also bodes ill for the future if astronomers are correct in projecting that a heavier Milky Way will inevitably collide with its neighbor Andromeda sooner than it otherwise would have.

Links:

Yo Galaxy’s Mama Is a Black Hole
Did the big bang spawn trillions of black holes?
Black Holes Grew Fast, Merged Early
Milky Way 50 Percent Larger
Expanded Very Large Array
Atacama Large Millimeter / submillimeter Array

Most of us have never heard of this “Copernican Principle” that is apparently so popular in astrophysics. According to Wikipedia The Copernican principle insists that Earth is not in a central, specially favored position in the universe (or solar system). New York Times science blogger John Tierney examines the principle as part of the Doomsday argument.

Physicists at Oxford University, however, have released a paper that reaches the conclusion that we just might inhabit a ’special’ region of the universe after all.

In the article Dark Energy: Is It Merely An Illusion?, the Oxford scientists theorize that we might instead inhabit a “huge void” in the universe where the density of matter is particularly low. This would tend to account for increasing expansion, which simply cannot be explained by the gravitational realities factored on the density of matter, on the assumption that the density is uniform throughout the universe.

The Oxford mavericks conclude that forthcoming tests of the Copernican principle should help sort the reality from the theories in the next few years.

As the LHC accelerator at CERN prepares to complete final whole-torus testing and “shoot the moon” with particles colliding at ~5TeV per beam, the report from the DZero experiment at Fermilab’s Tevatron is in – “Wiggly Higgly” (the so-called “God Particle” that imparts mass to matter) remains missing in action at 170GeV/c2.

The prediction that the Higgs boson would appear at 114GeV/c2 was ruled out in 2000, this experiment rules out the next best guess of mass for the exchange particle. This finding will tend to put more importance on findings expected from the higher energy levels at LHC over the next few years, though experimenters have long believed Higgs would be discovered at the lower Tevatron energies. That appears to have been ruled out too.

Higgs is probably the most famous component of the ‘Standard Model’ of physics to remain MIA after so much expense over so many years of seeking answers about the nature of nature. The Tevatron experiment did succeed in producing Z boson pairs, so researchers had maintained hope for Higgs at this level.

It took 600 physicists from 90 institutions in 18 countries to determine that Higgs is not present at 170GeV. Perhaps the LHC physicists will have better luck while they’re busy producing quark-gluon plasmas, mini black holes and other odd sub-sub-particles of interest. It’s scheduled to be fully up and running by October, so some answers should come soon!

Link:

Hunt for Elusive Higgs Boson Gets Boost

Big astrophysics science news this week that a Big Chunk of the Universe Is Missing – Again. This requires a little background for understanding how it is our universe can be so adept at playing hide-and-seek.

As much as 96% of the mass necessary to account for how our universe is observed to be has been missing for a long time. The mass is necessary to explain the gravity that holds galaxies together, but all the atomic matter we can see in planets, comets, asteroids, assorted space junk, stars and galaxies accounts for just 4% of it. In 1974 astronomer Vera Rubin discovered that instead of following a Newtonian scheme where Mercury travels faster around the sun than Neptune does, almost all stars rotating around a galaxy’s center – at any distance – all travel at the same speed.

There had to be some ‘extra’ source of gravity working in galaxies, but there wasn’t nearly enough mass to account for this anomaly. The choice was between gravity being variable (unthinkable!) or the existence of a great deal of extra mass that we couldn’t see. Scientists jumped on that answer in defense of Newtonian/Einsteinian gravity and gifted us with “Dark Matter.”

They couldn’t come up with likely candidates enough to cover more than about 21% of the necessary extra mass, so they soon came up with some fudges for gravity itself – an “anti-gravity” force called Dark Energy where they could hide the anomalous data. They were up to 4% matter + 21% Dark Matter + 75% Dark Energy. Voilå! Universe explained.

That scientists had no real grasp on what Dark Matter and Dark Energy really are did not particularly upset them, and these have become consensus theory. There are some intriguing alternative theories out there, but none enjoy consensus status and are mostly considered somewhat ‘crackpot’ – aether theories, geometrical theories, and ‘hyper’ theories that include extra large dimensions are generally frowned upon even though some of them actually do attempt to describe the empirical observations without sacrificing 96% of reality to phantom agents.

In 2000, astrophysicists thought the missing matter might be in the form of gas or plasma in the intergalactic medium. Then in 2002 the Chandra space-based telescope seemed to confirm that theory when it discovered 7% of the missing universe.

By 2007 astronomers and astrophysicists were back on the trail, reporting that they’d found hundreds of ‘missing’ black holes hiding in galaxies billions of light years away. Which translates into a finding that billions of years ago there were hundreds of black holes in some galaxies…

“Active, supermassive black holes were everywhere in the early universe,” said Mark Dickinson of the National Optical Astronomy Observatory in Tucson, Ariz. “We had seen the tip of the iceberg before in our search for these objects. Now, we can see the iceberg itself.” Dickinson is a co-author of two new papers appearing in the Nov. 10 issue of the Astrophysical Journal.

Now the new research from the University of Alabama in Huntsville [UAH] informs us that we’re 20% light again even after the discoveries in 2002 and 2005 (and all those black holes discovered just last month). Turns out that a lot of those x-rays supposedly coming from the intergalactic clouds of hot gas are instead probably caused by electrons. Electrons are a lot smaller than atoms, with a lot less mass. Those rivers can’t hold the amount of mass previously attributed to them.

Well, they still have WIMPs [Weakly Interacting Massive Particles] as a candidate for missing matter. Problem with these theoretical beasties is that they’re even less interactive than neutrinos, so much more difficult to detect. In fact, nobody’s ever seen a WIMP or measured any Dark Energy. The term “Dark” in these cases means “We Don’t Know” what the heck it is, or even if it exists at all. But the standard models of how our universe works requires filling in huge (as in 90%) gaps with whatever sounds reasonable right now. The alternative – that our standard models are wrong – is too dire to contemplate.

So anyone interested in the stars – and that’s a lot of us, young and old – should try to keep current on the question of what the “missing” 90% of our universe might be, and where it could be hiding. It’s certainly an entertaining pastime, and never dull!

Links:

Dark Matter the Answer to the “Missing Universe?”

Astronomers Find Part of Universe’s Missing Matter

Big Bang Theory Saved

Galaxy Cluster Surveys May Help Explain “Dark Energy”