<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forest Management vs. Carbon Sequestration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencenewsreview.com/forest-management-vs-carbon-sequestration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencenewsreview.com/forest-management-vs-carbon-sequestration/</link>
	<description>A fun look at science news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:24:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencenewsreview.com/forest-management-vs-carbon-sequestration/comment-page-1/#comment-1087</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 21:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencenewsreview.com/?p=157#comment-1087</guid>
		<description>Forest fires release carbon that had been previously sequestered in forests. As a result, forest fire prevention enhances carbon sequestration. It does not negate it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forest fires release carbon that had been previously sequestered in forests. As a result, forest fire prevention enhances carbon sequestration. It does not negate it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencenewsreview.com/forest-management-vs-carbon-sequestration/comment-page-1/#comment-1055</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencenewsreview.com/?p=157#comment-1055</guid>
		<description>There is a lot of hype about thinning forest to fire hazard, but it is very important for forest managers to recognize this trade-off between thinning which may enhance climate adaptation/resilience, while in most cases also reduce carbon storage and climate mitigation. We might increase ecosystem resilience at the local scale, while threatening the climate at the global scale.

Here is a slide show clarifying many misconceptions about forests, logging, and carbon:
http://www.slideshare.net/dougoh/forest-carbon-climate-myths-presentation/

And here is a more detailed foot-noted report on forests, carbon and climate change:
http://tinyurl.com/2n96m5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a lot of hype about thinning forest to fire hazard, but it is very important for forest managers to recognize this trade-off between thinning which may enhance climate adaptation/resilience, while in most cases also reduce carbon storage and climate mitigation. We might increase ecosystem resilience at the local scale, while threatening the climate at the global scale.</p>
<p>Here is a slide show clarifying many misconceptions about forests, logging, and carbon:<br />
<a href="http://www.slideshare.net/dougoh/forest-carbon-climate-myths-presentation/" rel="nofollow">http://www.slideshare.net/dougoh/forest-carbon-climate-myths-presentation/</a></p>
<p>And here is a more detailed foot-noted report on forests, carbon and climate change:<br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/2n96m5" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2n96m5</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
