<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Uh, Oh. &#8220;Copernican Principle&#8221; Might Be Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencenewsreview.com/uh-oh-copernican-principle-might-be-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencenewsreview.com/uh-oh-copernican-principle-might-be-wrong/</link>
	<description>A fun look at science news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:24:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencenewsreview.com/uh-oh-copernican-principle-might-be-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencenewsreview.com/uh-oh-copernican-principle-might-be-wrong/#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>Chad.

If you knew anything about Science you would know the Copernican principle has grown to included the idea proposed by Sagan and others that there is nothing, at all, special about the location of earth--OR Earth itself. Implying that life is everywhere.

At the time sagan was inept enough to state that all you would need was a planet about the same distance as earth to a sun, along with a few other conditions and Shazaam....life.

It is now known that there are billions of factors involved and that the odds are so astronomical that not only should earth be the only one---but that it defies the odds that earth exists at all. Yes, many scientists dont agree because most are diehard atheists--but Mathematicians know the odds are not really odds--they are Zero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chad.</p>
<p>If you knew anything about Science you would know the Copernican principle has grown to included the idea proposed by Sagan and others that there is nothing, at all, special about the location of earth&#8211;OR Earth itself. Implying that life is everywhere.</p>
<p>At the time sagan was inept enough to state that all you would need was a planet about the same distance as earth to a sun, along with a few other conditions and Shazaam&#8230;.life.</p>
<p>It is now known that there are billions of factors involved and that the odds are so astronomical that not only should earth be the only one&#8212;but that it defies the odds that earth exists at all. Yes, many scientists dont agree because most are diehard atheists&#8211;but Mathematicians know the odds are not really odds&#8211;they are Zero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencenewsreview.com/uh-oh-copernican-principle-might-be-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-1072</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 02:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencenewsreview.com/uh-oh-copernican-principle-might-be-wrong/#comment-1072</guid>
		<description>are you serious? the copernican principle only states that the earth is not the center of our solar system, the sun is. it may have become an interpretation of earth not being the center of the universe, but thats due to other reasons as well. 

haha, yes sun centered solar systems are SOOOOOOO popular today in astrophysics. why dont they gather some facts and make a conclusion based on that, instead of going with popular argument. EARTH #1 everything else BLOWS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are you serious? the copernican principle only states that the earth is not the center of our solar system, the sun is. it may have become an interpretation of earth not being the center of the universe, but thats due to other reasons as well. </p>
<p>haha, yes sun centered solar systems are SOOOOOOO popular today in astrophysics. why dont they gather some facts and make a conclusion based on that, instead of going with popular argument. EARTH #1 everything else BLOWS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
